Curse

RavagerOfDreams · Mar 04, 2008, 12:06 AM // 00:06

Quote:

Originally Posted by FlamingMetroid

only if I get unchained skills for my assassin

freedom would be nice

Mesmer in Need · Mar 04, 2008, 12:10 AM // 00:10

No. Assassins are bad enough. Btw:
[skill]hammer bash[/skill][skill]crushing blow[/skill]
[skill]sever artery[/skill][skill]gash[/skill]
The second skill wont work half as well without the first or something similar. I would call that a chain.

yum · Mar 04, 2008, 12:29 AM // 00:29

I herd ppl had great suggestions here.

Arkantos · Mar 04, 2008, 12:31 AM // 00:31

Highly unnecessary. Warriors and dervish attack skills are fine as they are, they don't need to be restricted to attack chains.

RavagerOfDreams · Mar 04, 2008, 03:11 AM // 03:11

they are fine the way they are?

Elisabet Ramsey · Mar 04, 2008, 03:16 AM // 03:16

Quote:

Originally Posted by Winterclaw

Well, can you think of any other way that warriors can be updated such that most of them aren't running the same build once you get to a high-level of gameplay?

Well if you don't like the way warriors are played, maybe you should stop playing one.

Lykan · Mar 04, 2008, 03:23 AM // 03:23

Quote:

Originally Posted by Winterclaw

Well, can you think of any other way that warriors can be updated such that most of them aren't running the same build once you get to a high-level of gameplay?

There wont be any big updates, stop asking for dumb stuff.

And yes it is a dumb suggestion, go play a sin if you want to press 12345 all day.

Master Sword Keeper · Mar 04, 2008, 03:45 AM // 03:45

[skill]enraging charge[/skill],[skill]pious assault[/skill],[skill]Counter attack[/skill],[skill]final thrust[/skill], [skill] Flourish[/skill]

ShadowsRequiem · Mar 04, 2008, 04:48 AM // 04:48

Worst thread ever.

Richardt · Mar 04, 2008, 05:26 AM // 05:26

Quote:

Originally Posted by Winterclaw

Anyways think of it like comboing in a fighting game. You can do one move whenever, but if you use it after another one, it works a bit better.

That's kinda how it is for warriors now.

One thing that drove me up a wall with sins was the chained attacks.

newbie_of_doom · Mar 04, 2008, 10:43 AM // 10:43

No let's keep it like 'warriors actually take skill to play', okay?

U Wanna Die · Mar 04, 2008, 11:13 AM // 11:13

This would kill so many builds

/notsigned

draxynnic · Mar 04, 2008, 01:30 PM // 13:30

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mesmer in Need

No. Assassins are bad enough. Btw:
[skill]hammer bash[/skill][skill]crushing blow[/skill]
[skill]sever artery[/skill][skill]gash[/skill]
The second skill wont work half as well without the first or something similar. I would call that a chain.

However, the Warrior does have the ability to let someone else fill the condition. Now, most Warriors prefer to do it themselves, but sometimes your skillbar is just that tight, and promoting teamwork is hardly a bad thing.

I don't think specific chains are a good idea, though. It's the assassin that's supposed to be reminiscent of Scorpion and the other Mortal Kombat or Street Fighter characters - leave the strict comboes to them, and let Warriors choose to take only one attack skill if they have a good enough reason to do so without having to worry about whether that skill is supposed to be a 'finishing' skill.

Reinfire · Mar 04, 2008, 02:17 PM // 14:17

/notsigned.

I dont want warriors to become brainless 123456 buttoning like sins

RhanoctJocosa · Mar 04, 2008, 02:23 PM // 14:23

Quote:

Originally Posted by holymasamune

With something like Bulls-Eviscerate-Bodyblow, I would hate to see it go into a L-O-D combo. The power of the warrior is that you don't need to hit the first attack to hit the next as long as you have the adren built up. That allows for better half spikes and fake spikes, and more depth in strategy compared to the one-dimensional hit or miss assassin.

qft 123456789

Macks Mistress · Mar 04, 2008, 02:29 PM // 14:29

How would this vary warrior builds exactly?

Most sin builds are samey because of the attack chains it seems. I'm trying to see your point of view, but it honestly doesn't make any sense.

Warriors are fine the way they are. Most of the time you are executing an attack chain anyway, there seems little point making them like an assassin because...well they arn't.

Drelias Melaku · Mar 04, 2008, 03:29 PM // 15:29

I agree with all of the other comments on this thread... Warriors aren't assassins. If you want to play attack chains on a warrior, use it as an armored assassin.

Orange Milk · Mar 04, 2008, 03:34 PM // 15:34

Who's your crack dealer Winterclaw?

Can I get his number? seems like he sells some good shit.